Current:Home > InvestJudge sets April trial date for Sarah Palin’s libel claim against The New York Times-InfoLens
Judge sets April trial date for Sarah Palin’s libel claim against The New York Times
View Date:2024-12-23 15:49:50
NEW YORK (AP) — A federal judge set an April retrial date on Tuesday for Sarah Palin’s libel case against The New York Times, even as lawyers on both sides for the first time said they hope to engage in talks to settle the case.
Judge Jed S. Rakoff said during a telephone conference that the trial can begin April 14 if a deal can’t be made before then.
The lawsuit by the onetime Republican vice presidential candidate and ex-governor of Alaska stemmed from a 2017 Times’ editorial. Rakoff had dismissed the case in February 2022 as a jury was deliberating, but the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan restored her claim in August.
David L. Axelrod, a lawyer for the Times, told Rakoff that lawyers had spoken about exploring how to resolve the case, particularly since it has become harder to locate witnesses because so much time has passed.
“It may be that we don’t need a trial at all,” he said.
Kenneth G. Turkel, a lawyer for Palin, agreed, noting that the two sides had never tried mediation.
He said lawyers wanted “to give it a shot.”
Rakoff seemed eager for a settlement.
“I’m all for that if you’re seriously interested in settling. You can settle it in a matter of days,” the judge said, adding that he could probably line up a magistrate judge within a day to meet with them and aid settlement talks.
Axelrod said the lawyers were interested in getting a third party to mediate. Turkel said they wanted “some type of discussion; we’ve had none.”
Palin sued the newspaper after an editorial falsely linked her campaign rhetoric to a mass shooting. Palin said it damaged her reputation and career.
The Times acknowledged its editorial was inaccurate but said it quickly corrected errors it described as an “honest mistake.” It also said there was no intent to harm Palin.
After Rakoff dismissed the case, he let the jurors finish deliberating and announce their verdict, which went against Palin.
In reversing Rakoff’s ruling and opening the way for a new trial, the 2nd Circuit concluded that Rakoff made credibility determinations, weighed evidence, and ignored facts or inferences that a reasonable juror could plausibly find supported Palin’s case.
The appeals court also noted that Rakoff’s mid-deliberations ruling might have reached jurors through alerts delivered to cellphones and thus could “impugn the reliability of that verdict.”
veryGood! (5665)
Related
- Investigators believe Wisconsin kayaker faked his own death before fleeing to eastern Europe
- Brian Austin Green’s Ex Vanessa Marcil Slams “Stupid” Criticism Aimed at Megan Fox
- The Most Wanted Details on Bad Bunny’s Best Fashion Moments and 2024 Met Gala Look
- When is daylight saving time? Here's what it means and when to 'fall back' in 2024
- Exclusive Yankee Candle Sale: 50% Off Holiday Candles for a Limited Time
- A.J. Jacobs on The Year of Living Constitutionally
- More than a decade after a stroke, Randy Travis sings again, courtesy of AI
- Met Gala 2024 Red Carpet Fashion: See Every Look As the Stars Arrive
- Judge sets April trial date for Sarah Palin’s libel claim against The New York Times
- 5 years after federal suit, North Carolina voter ID trial set to begin
Ranking
- Wildfires burn on both coasts. Is climate change to blame?
- Boy Scout volunteer sentenced to 22 years for hiding cameras in bathrooms in Missouri
- Long Beach shooting injures 7, 4 critically wounded, police say
- Canadian police made 3 arrests in slaying of Sikh separatist leader
- Advocacy group sues Tennessee over racial requirements for medical boards
- Detroit man sentenced to 80 years for fatal shootings of 2 West Virginia women
- Civil rights leader Daisy Bates and singer Johnny Cash to replace Arkansas statues at the US Capitol
- Prosecutors charge 5 men accused of impersonating Philadelphia police officers in 2006 to kidnap and kill a man
Recommendation
-
Smithfield agrees to pay $2 million to resolve child labor allegations at Minnesota meat plant
-
Fraternity says it removed member for ‘racist actions’ during Mississippi campus protest
-
A man tried to shoot a pastor during a church service but his gun wouldn’t fire, state police say
-
Massachusetts detective's affair exposed during investigation into his wife's shooting death
-
Trump’s economic agenda for his second term is clouding the outlook for mortgage rates
-
Anna Wintour Holds Court at the 2024 Met Gala in a Timeless Silhouette
-
Miss USA Noelia Voigt makes 'tough decision' to step down. Read her full statement.
-
Slain nurse’s husband sues health care company, alleging it ignored employees’ safety concerns